Skip to main content

The American Dream

I've just finished reading Nancy MacLean's book, Democracy in Chains, and I recommend it to everyone who is at all, even remotely interested in the future of our country, political stripe notwithstanding.  Whether you tend to vote Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Green, Communist, or Write-In, this is a book that you should read. 

It is a deeply informative book with great historical context about James M. Buchanan and the development and application of his economic theories.  Ms MacLean also delves into his connections to organizations like the Mont Pelerin Society, his involvement with Chile's Augusto Pinochet, America's Koch Brothers, and more.  Dovetailing into the Buchanan background, MacLean then turns her focus toward the Kochs and how they have developed a plan, based on Buchanan's work, to take control, bit by bit, of the levers of power in and around the government of the United States in order, ultimately, to shift the balance of power from the majority to the wealthy minority.

MacLean makes it clear that for the wealthy who are aligned with Charles Koch's take no prisoners, fend for yourself, win control at all costs (and I do mean all, including, but not limited to the dishonest manipulation of the citizenry), Darwinian plan for the future of America it must seem like their American Dream is about to be realized. 

For those of us on the normal pay scale, those living paycheck to paycheck, those for whom the questions do not revolve around which high-end car we should buy, but rather whether or not we can afford a car at all, if we don't wake up now and take steps to counteract his machinations we are soon to wake up in a country where

  • organizing to protest might be illegal 
  • clean water will be provided by unregulated private companies rather than government provision (Flint, MI water, anyone?)
  • there will be more control and weight given to the voices of the wealthy who happen to own property, rather than each and every individual to whom has been endowed "certain inalienable rights"
  • the Constitution is being rewritten to shut out the masses. (see Chile/Pinochet/Buchanan)
Those truths the country's forefathers held to be self-evident, "that all men are created equal", which has been expanded to include men and women, of all races and creeds, and of all financial histories will be changed to apply to the wealthy "producers" rather than those they deem to be "mooching" off the system through their use of Medicare, Medicaid, public schools, public water works, and more.

I know this all sounds extreme, but Ms MacLean has it all well-documented.  According to her research the Koch machine is not interested in protecting Republicans, nor Democrats, nor Libertarians.  Indeed, it is intent on protecting the interests and wealth of the wealthy, and it seeks to usurp the control of government from the majority and hand it over to those wealthy individuals.

It seems to me upon having read this work, that Charles Koch and his acolytes have gamed-out the possible permutations of the fights and challenges they might face.  After gaming-out the possibilities they began eliminating them one by one, starting with the easiest and least visible, from the end of the line forward so that when the step is taken which we will all see, and which will cause us to begin to realize what is happening, it will be too late to stop it.  Think of it like this.  If we don't stand in front of that bowling ball soon, it will be too late.

This book is worth the time it takes to read!  You can find it here on AmazonPlease read it and go to the polls in November to make sure that Koch's tightening choke hold on American democracy is weakened. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

All for one?

Yesterday I was in a union meeting.  Among other things, a brief discussion was had about the evolution of individual contracts versus group contracts in particular among ballet and theater companies, not necessarily on the opera side of things.  It was pointed out that the movement began primarily because more and more dancers wanted to be seen as soloists in the troupe rather than "ensemble dancers", and they wanted to negotiate their own contracts accordingly.  Over time that has led to less negotiating power for dancers, ultimately developing into much lower pay, often the legal minimum salary for dancers. That led me to connect the dots between that devolution of solidarity in the ranks of ballet troupes where each had been a part of the braided fabric, strong and durable, to the political devolution we're starting to see around the world.  For some time now, countries have been murmuring about wanting out of the EU.  Granted, there are positives and nega...

Strange start, I know

So, here I sit just killing a little time after reading articles about the Dallas Cowboys.  I took a few minutes to entertain other people's thoughts on the 2017 NFL Draft and am intrigued by several things, but one in particular stands out to me and I wanted to jot it down here and now. I know that the Browns are currently 0-for-2016, but they've been within one score in four of their games this year, and within two scores in four others, and there is good young talent there.  So, I am going to say here and now that the NFL better look out for them next season.  As long as they do well with their picks in 2017, they will be an incredibly talented group next year.  With FIVE picks in the top 65 of the draft they could possibly wind up with four or five first-round talents, depending on slippage and preferences of other teams.  So, I'm just saying it here, mid-December 2016, watch out for the 2017 Cleveland Browns! Stranger things have happened! (see Election...

Let it Go

In case you missed it, a major turning point in the movie Frozen  is the song "Let it Go".  It is during this song where Elsa literally takes off the gloves and lets her special power come out.  What results is spectacular.  While she still feels strange or dangerous, it is at this time that she starts to at least be able to grapple with the reality of what she can do and she begins learning how to harness the power that she has.  I feel like Hillary Clinton needs to embrace what she really is at this point, a failed and defeated presidential candidate, and let it go. I won't go into the myriad reasons people enumerate as to why Clinton lost the presidency.  You can find those on YouTube or the nightly news archives.  What I will say is that it is my opinion that, though Hillary's presence on TV talking about likely Russian involvement in the election, the sexism she feels is still alive and well, or any other perceived reason she was defeated might ...