Skip to main content

All for one?

Yesterday I was in a union meeting.  Among other things, a brief discussion was had about the evolution of individual contracts versus group contracts in particular among ballet and theater companies, not necessarily on the opera side of things.  It was pointed out that the movement began primarily because more and more dancers wanted to be seen as soloists in the troupe rather than "ensemble dancers", and they wanted to negotiate their own contracts accordingly.  Over time that has led to less negotiating power for dancers, ultimately developing into much lower pay, often the legal minimum salary for dancers.

That led me to connect the dots between that devolution of solidarity in the ranks of ballet troupes where each had been a part of the braided fabric, strong and durable, to the political devolution we're starting to see around the world.  For some time now, countries have been murmuring about wanting out of the EU.  Granted, there are positives and negatives to EU membership, but by and large it seems to have been a net positive for the entire region.  Now we have seen the first major decision about it in the wake of the Brexit referendum.  Scotland wants to leave the UK in order to stay in the EU.  Greece, Italy, and others have wanted to leave the EU for some time.  And NOW we have a President-Elect in the United States who says that the policy will be America first.

This sort of isolationist thinking is starting to gain traction across the world and it has its roots in the comfort of wealth and privilege that we enjoy in the western world today.  I can have any number of culinary experiences in any given day.  I can get exactly the type of clothing I want to be able to express my own personal style and world view.  I can choose precisely the niche news feed that I want on my personal, hand-held computing device, be it smartphone, tablet, watch or other, or ALL of the above.

"From he to whom much is given much is required."  We have been given great gifts in the western world; wealth (compared to much of the world) and freedom.  We must not squander them by focusing on what we think will be best for our own bottom line.  We must realize that rising tides raise all boats.  We must realize that it's not always "the other guy" who needs to make the sacrifice and compromise.  Each of us must look at the larger picture and see that if each is for himself, none is for the whole.  We can not tend only our own garden and expect to see our neighbor help us out when a fire ravages our crops.  We must rebuild a social and economic mindset that is concerned with the greater good; before it's too late.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It takes time; stay the course

Our world has been changed by the digital age.  Do you doubt that or would you like to have some more confirmation?  Read this brief article about  shortened attention spans  and I'll see you back in a minute. It shocked me to find out that our attention spans have shrunk to 8 seconds.  Knowing that, I'll keep this brief.  In this world where we have the opportunity to seek out any entertainment we want with a few button clicks or screen taps; where we can instantaneously eliminate our perceived boredom in any way we desire; where murders get solved before our very eyes in 60 minutes, repeatedly; and where written responses to personal or professional questions can be sent and received in seconds between correspondents halfway around the world, we run the danger of not being able to enact change in our politics. We who did not vote for the Trump administration must stay patient.  We must stay focused.  We must stay motivated.  To enact ch...

Strange start, I know

So, here I sit just killing a little time after reading articles about the Dallas Cowboys.  I took a few minutes to entertain other people's thoughts on the 2017 NFL Draft and am intrigued by several things, but one in particular stands out to me and I wanted to jot it down here and now. I know that the Browns are currently 0-for-2016, but they've been within one score in four of their games this year, and within two scores in four others, and there is good young talent there.  So, I am going to say here and now that the NFL better look out for them next season.  As long as they do well with their picks in 2017, they will be an incredibly talented group next year.  With FIVE picks in the top 65 of the draft they could possibly wind up with four or five first-round talents, depending on slippage and preferences of other teams.  So, I'm just saying it here, mid-December 2016, watch out for the 2017 Cleveland Browns! Stranger things have happened! (see Election...