Skip to main content

Here we go!

There are so many things to say, so many things that have been running through my mind over the last two-and-a-half months.  My mind feels a bit like responsible journalists must feel in their attempts to corral the untruths and contradictions foisted upon us during the presidential campaign.  There's so much frustration noise that I can't seem to focus in on one thing.  But I shall try!

I don't know about anyone else, but I went to bed upset and I woke up mad.

I don't usually put much stock in horoscopes, but I've always found it interesting that I have such a desire for things to be fair, and I happen to be a Libra which, in case you don't know, is symbolized by a set of scales in astrology.

Fairness.  Balance.

That's one of the wonderful things about a democracy, is it not?  The majority will carry the day and we will move forwarded guided by the ideas and ideals shared by more than 50% of our fellow Americans.  And yet, here we sit, on January 21st, 2017, being led by a President who garnered 2.8 million fewer votes than his principal opponent.  It's easy to see that number and not be struck by it's largeness.  Consider for a moment that there are Americans who earn $2,864 per month.  That's a number I can get my mind around.  Now, multiply that by 1000 months.  If each dollar earned were to represent one vote in the difference between President Trump and Hillary Clinton, it would take 83 YEARS and 4 MONTHS to earn the 2,864,903 votes that she led by at the end of the election count.

Now, then, hear me out, please.  This is not sour grapes.  I understand the system we have, and will not get into that in this post.

My frustration comes when I see an age of reason in politics, which goes back generations, being slain by 1,000 tweets.  It comes from the blatant contradiction of self in which our new president engages.  It comes from the out-and-out lying in which our new president engages without any traction being gained in the effort of the media and others to decry those lies.  It comes from his tirades against Hillary Clinton's connections to Goldman Sachs, claiming those connections to be to some extent disqualifying for her to be president, meanwhile he steps into his transition and nominates six Goldman Sachs connections to his cabinet.  It comes from these clear and present dichotomies being excused by his supporters with an apparent inability to discern truth from fiction.

What to do with that frustration, with that anger that has been awakened in me as a result of the lack of balance, the void of fairness, and the dearth of truth?

What to do?

Act.  That's what.  So, today I will be joining with my wife and other ex-pats and German nationals as we march through Frankfurt in solidarity with the Women's Marches around the world.  I will move forward, taking action to promote more fairness, more truth, and more balance in the world in which I live.  I will work to communicate facts here, provide links to reason here, and act to keep reality accessible in the maelstrom of irrationality that I fear is coming.  I pray that my worries will ultimately be proven unwarranted, but at the start of this I will take the following advice: hope for the best, but prepare for the worst so that when the worst doesn't happen you'll be pleasantly surprised.

For some truth about where the country is at the end of Barack Obama's presidency that has, according to President Trump, left "carnage" in its wake, watch this: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/obama-leaves-legacy-of-extraordinary-accomplishments-858759747686  You can skip to the 6-minute mark if you would like to get right to the meat and potatoes, but the first six minutes are interesting.  Enjoy!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

All for one?

Yesterday I was in a union meeting.  Among other things, a brief discussion was had about the evolution of individual contracts versus group contracts in particular among ballet and theater companies, not necessarily on the opera side of things.  It was pointed out that the movement began primarily because more and more dancers wanted to be seen as soloists in the troupe rather than "ensemble dancers", and they wanted to negotiate their own contracts accordingly.  Over time that has led to less negotiating power for dancers, ultimately developing into much lower pay, often the legal minimum salary for dancers. That led me to connect the dots between that devolution of solidarity in the ranks of ballet troupes where each had been a part of the braided fabric, strong and durable, to the political devolution we're starting to see around the world.  For some time now, countries have been murmuring about wanting out of the EU.  Granted, there are positives and nega...

It takes time; stay the course

Our world has been changed by the digital age.  Do you doubt that or would you like to have some more confirmation?  Read this brief article about  shortened attention spans  and I'll see you back in a minute. It shocked me to find out that our attention spans have shrunk to 8 seconds.  Knowing that, I'll keep this brief.  In this world where we have the opportunity to seek out any entertainment we want with a few button clicks or screen taps; where we can instantaneously eliminate our perceived boredom in any way we desire; where murders get solved before our very eyes in 60 minutes, repeatedly; and where written responses to personal or professional questions can be sent and received in seconds between correspondents halfway around the world, we run the danger of not being able to enact change in our politics. We who did not vote for the Trump administration must stay patient.  We must stay focused.  We must stay motivated.  To enact ch...

Strange start, I know

So, here I sit just killing a little time after reading articles about the Dallas Cowboys.  I took a few minutes to entertain other people's thoughts on the 2017 NFL Draft and am intrigued by several things, but one in particular stands out to me and I wanted to jot it down here and now. I know that the Browns are currently 0-for-2016, but they've been within one score in four of their games this year, and within two scores in four others, and there is good young talent there.  So, I am going to say here and now that the NFL better look out for them next season.  As long as they do well with their picks in 2017, they will be an incredibly talented group next year.  With FIVE picks in the top 65 of the draft they could possibly wind up with four or five first-round talents, depending on slippage and preferences of other teams.  So, I'm just saying it here, mid-December 2016, watch out for the 2017 Cleveland Browns! Stranger things have happened! (see Election...