An Example from the SCOTUS Nomination

I just finished and published the article about how the SBC can be an instructor for the Democratic Party in how they act and react to moves made by the GOP. I just want to quote David Leonhardt here as support for my sentiments and link you to his article in the NY Times.

"I understand that all of these options sound aggressive and partisan, and it makes me deeply uncomfortable to make such an argument. But Democrats simply cannot play by the old set of rules now that the Republicans are playing by a new one. The only thing worse than the system the Republicans have created is a system in which one political party volunteers to be bullied."

Check out his article here.

Comments

All for one?

Yesterday I was in a union meeting. Among other things, a brief discussion was had about the evolution of individual contracts versus group contracts in particular among ballet and theater companies, not necessarily on the opera side of things. It was pointed out that the movement began primarily because more and more dancers wanted to be seen as soloists in the troupe rather than "ensemble dancers", and they wanted to negotiate their own contracts accordingly. Over time that has led to less negotiating power for dancers, ultimately developing into much lower pay, often the legal minimum salary for dancers. That led me to connect the dots between that devolution of solidarity in the ranks of ballet troupes where each had been a part of the braided fabric, strong and durable, to the political devolution we're starting to see around the world. For some time now, countries have been murmuring about wanting out of the EU. Granted, there are positives and nega...

A letter to Rachel

I just wrote this letter to Rachel Maddow. Hi Rachel, and her team, (Disclaimer: I wanted to write something shorter and more to the point, but this wound up being shaped in my mind like one of your A-blocks, with a somewhat-random-and-seemingly-out-of-the-blue starting point that comes around to underscore the point that is being crafted for the end just before the break. Please understand that as you start this.) While I love to laugh and know the value of laughter to help us through tough times, I have been frustrated on occasion with the laughter that happens on any number of news shows when describing our illustrious President's behavior. Don't get me wrong, I understand that things are so bizarre for normal, rational people that it seems uncomfortable and inconceivable that someone would act the way he acts, and so we laugh. However, it is my opinion and belief that serious times and serious actions call for serious people and serious responses. ...

Give an Inch to Gain a Mile

Imagine with me, if you will, a non-railed causeway that is just wide enough for two cars to pass. Now imagine that you are driving a car on that causeway when you look up and see another car coming at you. You need to get to the other side. They need to get to the other side. It seems scary and dangerous to move over. There's no railing, and a precipitous drop into the water awaits if you go too far. As I see it, there are five options: 1) Back up until you get to the start of the causeway so that the other car can get past you and out of your way. 2) Force the other driver to back up until you can get past him. 3) Sit there bumper to bumper and don't go anywhere. 4) Try to shove the other car off the causeway. 5) Carefully move to the side while the other driver does the same in order to provide space for both cars to get where they're going. Options 1 and 2 put one of the drivers in the position that they might encounter the same situatio...

A Layman's Look

Search This Blog