Skip to main content

Here we go!

There are so many things to say, so many things that have been running through my mind over the last two-and-a-half months.  My mind feels a bit like responsible journalists must feel in their attempts to corral the untruths and contradictions foisted upon us during the presidential campaign.  There's so much frustration noise that I can't seem to focus in on one thing.  But I shall try!

I don't know about anyone else, but I went to bed upset and I woke up mad.

I don't usually put much stock in horoscopes, but I've always found it interesting that I have such a desire for things to be fair, and I happen to be a Libra which, in case you don't know, is symbolized by a set of scales in astrology.

Fairness.  Balance.

That's one of the wonderful things about a democracy, is it not?  The majority will carry the day and we will move forwarded guided by the ideas and ideals shared by more than 50% of our fellow Americans.  And yet, here we sit, on January 21st, 2017, being led by a President who garnered 2.8 million fewer votes than his principal opponent.  It's easy to see that number and not be struck by it's largeness.  Consider for a moment that there are Americans who earn $2,864 per month.  That's a number I can get my mind around.  Now, multiply that by 1000 months.  If each dollar earned were to represent one vote in the difference between President Trump and Hillary Clinton, it would take 83 YEARS and 4 MONTHS to earn the 2,864,903 votes that she led by at the end of the election count.

Now, then, hear me out, please.  This is not sour grapes.  I understand the system we have, and will not get into that in this post.

My frustration comes when I see an age of reason in politics, which goes back generations, being slain by 1,000 tweets.  It comes from the blatant contradiction of self in which our new president engages.  It comes from the out-and-out lying in which our new president engages without any traction being gained in the effort of the media and others to decry those lies.  It comes from his tirades against Hillary Clinton's connections to Goldman Sachs, claiming those connections to be to some extent disqualifying for her to be president, meanwhile he steps into his transition and nominates six Goldman Sachs connections to his cabinet.  It comes from these clear and present dichotomies being excused by his supporters with an apparent inability to discern truth from fiction.

What to do with that frustration, with that anger that has been awakened in me as a result of the lack of balance, the void of fairness, and the dearth of truth?

What to do?

Act.  That's what.  So, today I will be joining with my wife and other ex-pats and German nationals as we march through Frankfurt in solidarity with the Women's Marches around the world.  I will move forward, taking action to promote more fairness, more truth, and more balance in the world in which I live.  I will work to communicate facts here, provide links to reason here, and act to keep reality accessible in the maelstrom of irrationality that I fear is coming.  I pray that my worries will ultimately be proven unwarranted, but at the start of this I will take the following advice: hope for the best, but prepare for the worst so that when the worst doesn't happen you'll be pleasantly surprised.

For some truth about where the country is at the end of Barack Obama's presidency that has, according to President Trump, left "carnage" in its wake, watch this: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/obama-leaves-legacy-of-extraordinary-accomplishments-858759747686  You can skip to the 6-minute mark if you would like to get right to the meat and potatoes, but the first six minutes are interesting.  Enjoy!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

All for one?

Yesterday I was in a union meeting.  Among other things, a brief discussion was had about the evolution of individual contracts versus group contracts in particular among ballet and theater companies, not necessarily on the opera side of things.  It was pointed out that the movement began primarily because more and more dancers wanted to be seen as soloists in the troupe rather than "ensemble dancers", and they wanted to negotiate their own contracts accordingly.  Over time that has led to less negotiating power for dancers, ultimately developing into much lower pay, often the legal minimum salary for dancers. That led me to connect the dots between that devolution of solidarity in the ranks of ballet troupes where each had been a part of the braided fabric, strong and durable, to the political devolution we're starting to see around the world.  For some time now, countries have been murmuring about wanting out of the EU.  Granted, there are positives and nega...

A letter to Rachel

I just wrote this letter to Rachel Maddow. Hi Rachel, and her team, (Disclaimer: I wanted to write something shorter and more to the point, but this wound up being shaped in my mind like one of your A-blocks, with a somewhat-random-and-seemingly-out-of-the-blue starting point that comes around to underscore the point that is being crafted for the end just before the break.  Please understand that as you start this.) While I love to laugh and know the value of laughter to help us through tough times, I have been frustrated on occasion with the laughter that happens on any number of news shows when describing our illustrious President's behavior.  Don't get me wrong, I understand that things are so bizarre for normal, rational people that it seems uncomfortable and inconceivable that someone would act the way he acts, and so we laugh.  However, it is my opinion and belief that serious times and serious actions call for serious people and serious responses.  ...

Give an Inch to Gain a Mile

Imagine with me, if you will, a non-railed causeway that is just  wide enough for two cars to pass. Now imagine that you are driving a car on that causeway when you look up and see another car coming at you.  You need to get to the other side.  They need to get to the other side.  It seems scary and dangerous to move over.  There's no railing, and a precipitous drop into the water awaits if you go too far.  As I see it, there are five options: 1) Back up until you get to the start of the causeway so that the other car can get past you and out of your way. 2) Force the other driver to back up until you can get past him. 3) Sit there bumper to bumper and don't go anywhere. 4) Try to shove the other car off the causeway. 5) Carefully move to the side while the other driver does the same in order to provide space for both cars to get where they're going. Options 1 and 2 put one of the drivers in the position that they might encounter the same situatio...